Journal: Journal of Physico-Chemical Material (JPCM), Volume:1, Issue:1, Pages: 1-6 Download pdf
Authors: Ghaleb Ali Al-Dahash, Taiba Hamid
Date: 7-2024
Abstract: The recent claim of a room-temperature, ambient-pressure superconductor, LK-99 [Pb10(PO4)6O], has ignited immense excitement and skepticism within the scientific community. This report critically analyzes the available evidence regarding the superconducting properties of LK99, considering both experimental findings and theoretical analyses. It explores the synthesis process, the observed phenomena, and the limitations of current research, concluding with a balanced perspective on the validity of the claim and the need for further investigation. Early publications by the Korean research group led by Sukbae Lee and Ji-Hoon Kim provided interesting data on the possibility of superconductivity in LK-99 at room temperature and atmospheric pressure f, an all characteristic of hyper conductivity but these findings have been met with significant scrutiny and skepticism by the broader scientific community. One major area of concern is the reproducibility of the results. Despite numerous attempts by researchers worldwide to synthesize and characterize LK-99, achieving consistent results have proven challenging. The synthesis process is complex and involves intricate steps that require careful control of temperature, pressure, and reactant ratios. Even slight variations in these parameters can significantly impact the final product, potentially leading to inconsistencies in the observed properties.
Another critical aspect is the lack of conclusive evidence supporting the presence of superconductivity in LK-99. While the initial reports showed a decrease in electrical resistance and diamagnetic behavior, these observations are not entirely conclusive and could be attributed to other factors, such as the presence of impurities or other conducting phases within the material. Furthermore, the absence of definitive Meissner effect observations, which would conclusively demonstrate the expulsion of magnetic fields from the superconductor, raises further questions. Theoretical analysis of the structure and electronic properties of LK-99 also presents challenges. The predicted band structure of the material suggests the possibility of superconductivity, but it remains unclear whether the specific properties of LK-99 contribute to room temperature superconductivity.
The scientific community is actively investigating the claims surrounding LK-99. Numerous research groups around the world are currently working on replicating the synthesis process and rigorously characterizing the material's properties. As the scientific community gathers more experimental and theoretical data, a clearer picture will emerge regarding the validity of the claims. It is essential to approach these findings with a critical eye, acknowledging both the potential for groundbreaking discoveries and the need for rigorous scientific validation. Accordingly, according to the experimental publications that investigated the creation of this new model, the claims were not proven true.
Keywords: Superconductors, lk-99, Room Temperature Superconductivity, Meissner effect
References:
[1] C. P. Poole, H. A. Farach, R. J. Creswick, and R. Prozorov, Superconductivity. Springer, 2007.
[2] S. Lee, J. H. Kim, and Y. Kwon, "The first room-temperature ambient pressure superconductor," arXiv:2307.12008, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.12008.
[3] S. Lee et al., "Superconductor Pb10−xCux(PO4)6O showing levitation at room temperature and atmospheric pressure and mechanism," arXiv:2307.12037, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2307.12037.
[4] S. Griffin, "The race to understand LK-99," Physics World, Aug. 8, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://physicsworld.com/a/the-race-to-understand-lk-99/
[5] P. A. Tipler and G. Mosca, Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6th ed. W. H. Freeman and Company, 2008.
[6] N. Wolchover, "LK-99 is probably not a room-temperature superconductor — here's why," Quanta Magazine, Aug. 9, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.quantamagazine.org/lk-99-is-probably-not-a-room-temperature-superconductor-heres-why-20230809/
[7] W. E. Pickett, "The next breakthrough in superconductivity," Nature Materials, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 1067–1068, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1038/nmat4457.
[8] M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. Dover Publications, 2004.
[9] J. G. Bednorz and K. A. Müller, "Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system," Zeitschrift für Physik B Condensed Matter, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 189-193, 1986.
[10] H. Maeda, Y. Tanaka, M. Fukutomi, and T. Asano, "A new high-Tc oxide superconductor without a rare earth element," Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 27, no. 2A, p. L209, 1988.
[11] A. Schilling, M. Cantoni, J. D. Guo, and H. R. Ott, "Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg–Ba–Ca–Cu–O system," Nature, vol. 363, no. 6424, pp. 56-58, 1993.
[12] E. Dagotto, "Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors," Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 66, no. 3, p. 763, 1994.
[13] Y. Tokura and T. Arima, "New classification method for layered copper oxide compounds and its application to design of new high Tc superconductors," Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 29, no. 11R, p. 2388, 1990.
[14] A. Gurevich, "To use or not to use cool superconductors?," Nature materials, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 255-259, 2011.
[15] D. Larbalestier, A. Gurevich, D. M. Feldmann, and A. Polyanskii, "High-Tc superconducting materials for electric power applications," Nature, vol. 414, no. 6861, pp. 368-377, 2001.
[16] R. Hott, R. Kleiner, T. Wolf, and G. Zwicknagl, "Review on superconducting materials," arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.0429, 2016.
[17] Y. K. Kwon et al., "Lk-99: A room-temperature superconductor with Tc of 400 K," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12008, 2023.
[18] J. E. Hirsch, F. Marsiglio, and D. J. Scalapino, "Implications of the claimed room temperature superconductor LK-99," arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16040, 2023.